“Simone Weil and George Herbert on the Vocations of Writing and Reading”
Religion & Literature, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 69-102
Religion & Literature, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 69-102
in Richard H. Bell, ed., Simone Weil’s Philosophy of Culture: Readings Toward Divine Humanity, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1993, pp. 77-92, also in in Phillips, Recovering Religious Concepts: Closing Epistemic Divides,London: Palgrave, pp. 211-226
Paradigms and Contentions, IWM Junior Visiting Fellows Conferences, vol. 7, pp. 1-11
The European Journal of Women’s Studies, Vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 183-200
in J. J. Hermsen, ed., The Judge and the Spectator: Hannah Arendt on Thought and Action (Leuven: Peeters)
Faith and Philosophy: Journal of the Society of Christian Philosophers, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 352-367
New York Times, (obit.)
Comparative Civilizations Review, vol. 38, no. 38, pp. 12-36
Excerpt:
Simone Weil, writing at the height of World War II in some of the darkest hours of the struggle against fascism, arrived at a similar conclusion in her oft-neglected but magnificent book, The Need for Roots (1943). The book was about the reconstruction of France and, by implication, all of Western civilization. In it she wrote that: “To be rooted is perhaps the most important and least recognized need of the human soul.” (p.41)
Weil’s method for rerooting humanity is to identify fundamental human needs and devise ways of fulfilling each of them, detailing necessary social reforms. Arendt defined rootedness as having a “place in the world, recognized and guaranteed by others” (Origins, p.475). Weil defines rootedness similarly, albeit in more depth, saying that it is “real, active, and natural participation in the life of a community which preserves in living shape certain particular treasures of the past and certain particular expectations for the future” (The Need for Roots, Routledge & Kegan Paul 1952 edition, p.41).
Religion, State & Society, vol. 26, nos 3-4, pp. 279-289.
Southeastern Political Review, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 593-610