Two slices from the same loaf? Weil and Levinas on the demand of social Justice
Ethical Perspectives: Journal of the European Ethics Network, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 117-138
Ethical Perspectives: Journal of the European Ethics Network, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 117-138
Logos: A Journal of Catholic Thought and Culture, vol. 9, Number no. 1, pp. 127-144
Montesquieu Lecture
Common Knowledge, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 252-260
Philosophy and Literature, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 349-364
Epoché: The University of California Journal for the Study of Religion, Vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 59-85.
Notices of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 52, no. 3, 334-341
According to Camus, it is only in the face of the absurd – and through our unremitting revolt against it – that meaning can be generated. Espousing the Christian faith abnegates the absurd and with it the only possible source of meaning for modem man. This critique can be addressed by engaging with Simone Weil. She develops an original dialectic of divine absence (in the laws of indifferent ’necessity’ and affliction) and presence, which reflects the intra-Trinitarian unity and distance of the divine Persons, and which finds ultimate expression on the Cross of Christ. For her this dialectic does not induce revolt but a sophisticated kind of reconciliation that involves a selfless openness to, and engagement with, this world.
Irish Theological Quarterly, vol. 70, pp. 343-354
Center for Global Justice
The Center for Christian Ethics pp. 37-46